Alaska updates on NPV, the Electoral College, and federalism.
NPV status: introduced 2007-failed; introduced 2009-failed; introduced in 2011-failed; a bill opposing NVP introduced in 2012-failed. HR10
Tweet In presidential elections, the big state of Alaska is a small state. It has only three electoral votes. In a country of 311 million people, it has a mere 722,000. Worse, it can be hard for presidential candidates to get to Alaska, given its distance from the 48 contiguous states. Alaska needs every...
Read more »
Posted in Alaska (3), Electoral College, NPV/Koza | 1 Comment »
Tweet Alaska’s legislature has been in session for less than two weeks, but apparently some state Senators were already itching to jump into action on the National Popular Vote issue. The Senate Finance committee heard the matter in a hearing this past Wednesday—about a week after the legislature convened. The legislation has been held,...
Read more »
Posted in Alaska (3), Electoral College, NPV/Koza | No Comments »
Tweet Last week I visited Juneau to talk with state legislators about National Popular Vote. NPV’s anti-Electoral College legislation (SB 39) has moved through two of their Senate committees in as many months. Because NPV says different things to different people, it’s always fascinating to pick up the echoes of their latest sales pitch. This...
Read more »
Tags: Alaska SB 39, Electoral College, Hollis French, Juneau, National Popular Vote, NPV
Posted in Alaska (3), NPV/Koza | No Comments »
Tweet On Friday, Alaska’s Senate Judiciary Committee heard the state’s National Popular Vote bill (SB 92). The measure actually already passed the State Affairs Committee with the support of Senators Linda Menard, Hollis French (who chairs the Judiciary Committee), and Albert Kookesh. (Watch the Judiciary hearing.) Alaska, the largest state by landmass but with...
Read more »
Tags: Electoral College, John Koza, moderation, National Popular Vote, NPV, swing states, unity
Posted in Alaska (3), Electoral College, NPV/Koza | 1 Comment »
Tweet The balance of power between state and national governments was one of the most contentious issues for the American Founders. The states were important historically, but also as a way to keep government close to the people and to divide government power into as many hands as practical in order to preserve liberty....
Read more »
Tags: Constitution, Constitutional Convention, diversity, Federalism, freedom, States
Posted in Alabama (9), Alaska (3), Arizona (11), Arkansas (6), California (55), Colorado (9), Connecticut (7), Delaware (3), Federalism, Florida (29), Georgia (16), Hawaii (4), Idaho (4), Illinois (20), Indiana (11), Iowa (6), Kansas (6), Kentucky (8), Louisiana (8), Maine (4), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (11), Michigan (16), Minnesota (10), Mississippi (6), Missouri (10), Montana (3), Nebraska (5), Nevada (6), New Hampshire (4), New Jersey (14), New Mexico (5), New York (29), North Carolina (15), North Dakota (3), Ohio (18), Oklahoma (7), Oregon (7), Pennsylvania (20), Rhode Island (4), South Carolina (9), South Dakota (3), States, Tennessee (11), Texas (38), Utah (6), Vermont (3), Virginia (13), Washington (12), West Virginia (5), Wisconsin (10), Wyoming (3) | 1 Comment »