New York updates on NPV, the Electoral College, and federalism.
NPV status: introduced 2006-failed; introduced 2007-failed; introduced 2008-failed; introduced 2009-carried over; passed Senate 2010-delivered to Assembly S02286
Note: I’ve stuck this post from last year to the top since it provides a good overview of what Save Our States is all about. -TE The Electoral College was one of the least controversial provisions of the original Constitution. The state-by-state way we elect the President of the United States gives each state...
Read more »
Tags: Electoral College, Federalism, John Koza, National Popluar Vote, NPV, political institutions, republican government, state legislatures
Posted in Delaware (3), Electoral College, Massachusetts (12), New York (31), NPV/Koza | 13 Comments »
Tonight Save Our States is hosting a Citizens’ Briefing to explain the importance of the Electoral College and the threat of the National Popular Vote plan. A lot of people don’t like the Electoral College. Even more people don’t understand it. There are plenty of arguments for the institution’s irreplaceable contribution to American liberty...
Read more »
Tags: citizen action, Delaware State Senate, Electoral College, interstate compact, Massachusetts legislature, National Popular Vote legislation, New York legislature
Posted in Delaware (3), Electoral College, Massachusetts (12), New York (31), NPV/Koza | 2 Comments »
Last week, the Massachusetts House of Representatives passed National Popular Vote (NPV) legislation, part of the attempt to unravel the Electoral College without amending the Constitution. Yesterday, the New York State Senate passed the same bill. In each state, the measure moves to the other legislative chamber for consideration. So far this year NPV...
Read more »
Tags: Albany, Boston, H4156, legislation, legislature, lobbyists, National Popular Vote, NPV, S2286
Posted in Massachusetts (12), New York (31), NPV/Koza | 27 Comments »
The balance of power between state and national governments was one of the most contentious issues for the American Founders. The states were important historically, but also as a way to keep government close to the people and to divide government power into as many hands as practical in order to preserve liberty. At...
Read more »
Tags: Constitution, Constitutional Convention, diversity, Federalism, freedom, States
Posted in Alabama (9), Alaska (3), Arizona (10), Arkansas (6), California (55), Colorado (9), Connecticut (7), Delaware (3), Federalism, Florida (27), Georgia (15), Hawaii (4), Idaho (4), Illinois (21), Indiana (11), Iowa (7), Kansas (6), Kentucky (8), Louisiana (9), Maine (3), Maryland (10), Massachusetts (12), Michigan (17), Minnesota (10), Mississippi (6), Missouri (11), Montana (3), Nebraska (5), Nevada (5), New Hampshire (4), New Jersey (15), New Mexico (5), New York (31), North Carolina (15), North Dakota (3), Ohio (20), Oklahoma (7), Oregon (7), Pennsylvania (21), Rhode Island (4), South Carolina (8), South Dakota (3), States, Tennessee (11), Texas (34), Utah (5), Vermont (3), Virginia (13), Washington (11), West Virginia (5), Wisconsin (10), Wyoming (3) | 1 Comment »