National Popular Vote and the Constitution


So absurd it might be legal

“Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress….” (Article II, Section 1)

How did this constitutional provision become the NPV loophole?

Hundreds of attempts to amend the Electoral College out of the Constitution have all failed. But California computer scientist John Koza came up with a different idea, now known as National Popular Vote. He would convince state legislatures to pass a state law agreeing to give all their electoral votes to the presidential candidate with the most popular votes nationwide.

Many who had assumed that the Electoral College could only be changed by changing the Constitution at first rejected the possibility of Koza’s plan. But look at the Constitutional provision, quoted above, and you see what Koza sees as a great big legal loophole.

That’s the NPV argument: states can do whatever they want with this constitutional power. While the bare letter of the law may allow for Koza’s NPV plan, it’s worth considering both the original intent of the constitutional provision and the potential for absurd results from NPV’s interpretation of it.

The Framers and ratifiers of the Constitution intended for state legislatures to determine how best to represent their state’s interests in the presidential election process. They never imagined that state lawmakers would choose to eliminate their own state’s voice in choosing the President. Nor did they anticipate that state legislatures would surrender the structure of Federalism that provides some of the checks and balances that protect both the states as states and the Liberty of their people.

To the extent that NPV is right–states can award their electoral votes based on something unrelated to and outside of their own state–they might just as legally decide to select their electors based on the height of the candidates, a coin toss, or the Superbowl.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to National Popular Vote and the Constitution

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by trentengland and, said: National Popular Vote and the Constitution: “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof m… […]

  2. […] and the crew at Crosstalk radio for today’s discussion of the Electoral College versus National Popular Vote. It was my pleasure to be on the program and to talk with so many listeners from around the […]

  3. […] Popular Vote cleverly takes advantage of the Constitution’s grant of authority to state legislatures to determine how to allocate their electoral votes. For over a century, Electoral College opponents […]

Leave a Reply

Why Save our States?

The genius of the United States of America: we are both United and States. The American system of states is Federalism. One part of it is the Electoral College, the state-by-state way we elect the President of the United States.

Some 'reformers' want to unravel our system of states. The Freedom Foundation’s Save Our States Project is dedicated to preserving these structures for the sake of liberty. Find out more and join us.