<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Wisconsin would lose big time!&#8221; under National Popular Vote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saveourstates.com/2010/380/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saveourstates.com/2010/380/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:34:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention “Wisconsin would lose big time!” under National Popular Vote &#124; Save Our States defend the Electoral College -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.saveourstates.com/2010/380/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention “Wisconsin would lose big time!” under National Popular Vote &#124; Save Our States defend the Electoral College -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saveourstates.com/?p=380#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Diana Cieslak, SaveOurStates.com. SaveOurStates.com said: “Wisconsin would lose big time!” under National Popular Vote: Wisconsin has made it onto NPV’s list of targe... http://bit.ly/8gDE7s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Diana Cieslak, SaveOurStates.com. SaveOurStates.com said: “Wisconsin would lose big time!” under National Popular Vote: Wisconsin has made it onto NPV’s list of targe&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/8gDE7s" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/8gDE7s</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent</title>
		<link>http://www.saveourstates.com/2010/380/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 02:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saveourstates.com/?p=380#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Zweifel&#039;s story is full of errors. He asserts that some states award electoral votes proportionally, which is incorrect, and that one state uses the Congressional District method (both Maine and Nebraska do that). </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zweifel&#039;s story is full of errors. He asserts that some states award electoral votes proportionally, which is incorrect, and that one state uses the Congressional District method (both Maine and Nebraska do that).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diana</title>
		<link>http://www.saveourstates.com/2010/380/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Diana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saveourstates.com/?p=380#comment-42</guid>
		<description>As a fairly important aside, Zweifel is mistaken in which states have passed NPV. Maine has not; Washington has.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a fairly important aside, Zweifel is mistaken in which states have passed NPV. Maine has not; Washington has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

